Connect with us

European Leagues

How much money Dortmund or Real Madrid will get for winning Champions League

Published

on

Champions League prize money is crucial for European clubs, boosting finances significantly based on performance.

Champions League prize money is crucial for European clubs, boosting finances significantly based on performance.

The pay-out is split among winners, runners-up, semi-finalists, and more, with a performance-based reward system in place.

The pot includes money from performance results, coefficient pay-out, and broadcast market, significantly impacting all 32 teams involved.

With each passing year, the beautiful game has become all-too revolved around a pay-to-play structure – and continental football is the easiest way for clubs around the continent to boost their respective kitties. Winning – or even just featuring in – the Champions League has its obvious benefits.

It’s a sure-fire way of getting your side on the map for the lesser-known clubs, but the financial gain is somewhat unprecedented, particularly in comparison to those competing in the Europa League or the Europa Conference League. As a result, Europe’s top table is treated as the be all and end all of their respective seasons. Even for those who don’t reach the latter stages of the competition, strong performances can bring in additional income.

For this campaign, UEFA and the competition organisers revealed that the overall purse for Europe’s top table contenders would remain the same as 2022/23 – at €2.03 billion (£1.74bn/$2.19bn). Using figures courtesy of The Sporting News, here’s a comprehensive breakdown of how the Champions League prize money is given out: from how much the winner receives for reigning victorious to the finer details of how the rest of the teams are financially boosted.

Inside the Champions League Prize Money

Pep Guardiola’s Manchester City, after conquering Europe for the first time in their history last season, pocketed an eye-watering €80m (£68.4m/$86.4m). For either Real Madrid or Borussia Dortmund – the two sides that have reached this season’s rendition of the Champions League final – the maximum financial pay-out they could secure after the final is concluded is €85.14m.

In order to receive a healthy bounty, however, that would require either the Spanish or German side to have a perfect European campaign from start to finish. Looking beyond the eventual winner, there are several different ways in which the overall pot of money is handed out to completing clubs.

The Champions League sees the best players in the world compete — and some are very well paid.
The heaviest portion of money, which equates to 55% of the total prize pot, is distributed among the clubs dependent on their results in the competition. The other 45% is administered and split across the complete pool of 32 participants in two separate ways – 30% of it comes from the coefficient pay-out, and the other 15% from the broadcast market.

Performance-Based Prize Money
Winner earns an extra £17.2m (€20m)
The Champions League trophy on display
Performance-Based Money Distribution

Stage

Prize Money

Winner

£17.2m (€20m/$21.5m)

Runners-up

£12.9m (€15.5m/$16.12m)

Semi-finalists

£10.8m (€12.5m/$13.2m)

Quarter-finalists

£9.1m (€10.6m/$11.4m)

Round of 16

£8.3m (€9.6m/$10.3m)

Group stage wins

£2.4m(€2.8m/$3m)

Group stage draws

£800k (€930k/$1m)

Reaching group stage

£13.5m (€15.6m/$16.8m)

Simply, on the basis of how far a team progresses in the tournament, a grand total of 55% of the prize pot is handed out. Those who reach the group stage are guaranteed a pay out of £13.5m (€15.6m/$16.8m), while the results of the group stage games also yield financial gain.

Any draws result in an additional £800k (€930k/$1m), whereas group stage wins see teams pocket a healthy £2.4m (€2.8m/$3m) per victory. Those who crash out at the group stage are not in line for extra pay-outs, however, and the 16 teams who do manage to progress are promised additional money.

A total of £8.3m (€9.6m/$10.3m) is given out to the eight teams that secure Round of 16 status, while the pay-out increases to £9.1m (€10.6m/$11.4m) should they make further progress into the quarter-final stage. All four semi-finalists of this season’s Champions League – Manchester City, Bayern Munich, Real Madrid, and Borussia Dortmund – are awarded with an extra £10.8m (€12.5m/$13.2m), regardless of whether they win or lose.

Either Real Madrid or Borussia Dortmund will secure an additional £17.2m (€20m/$21.5m) when one of the aforementioned sides secures Champions League winners’ status at Wembley on June 1, 2024. The runner-up, instead, will earn £12.9m (€15.5m/$16.12m).

Coefficient Pay-Out
An additional £512m (€600m), which is equivalent to 30% of the total purse available, will be paid out across all 32 teams that participated in the 2023/24 Champions League – from the likes of Copenhagen to RC Lens to Young Boys all the way up to the final two finalists. The coefficient pay-out is based on UEFA’s algorithm that has tracked each side’s progress in UEFA tournaments, including the Champions League, Europa League and the Europa Conference League, over a 10-year period.

All 32 teams are ranked from No.1 and No.32 and there are bonus points on offer for those who have actually won trophies. All competing Champions League clubs are then paid accordingly to their position in UEFA’s club coefficient rankings, which can be viewed in full on the official UEFA website here.

The lowest-ranked team earns one share £1m (€1.137m), while the top-ranked team earns 32 shares £31m (€36.38m). The highest-ranked team left this season are Manchester City and the lowest-ranked was Newcastle United after their two-decade-long hiatus from European football.

Broadcast Market Pay-Out
Each season, a considerable chunk of prize money is up for grabs from Champions League broadcasting rights from all corners of the globe. This season, for all 32 teams, there is an additional £256m (€300m) on offer as part of the concluding broadcast revenue once all the broadcast-based deals are finalised.

For each country that is represented in Europe’s top tier club competition, from England to Switzerland, their federation is handed out a share of the final prize money, which is entirely dependent on the proportional value of each TV market.

This ensures that those leagues that are high in popularity – the Premier League, for example – are financially aided proportionally compared to other divisions – and federations – that rake in lower numbers of viewership. The total money is then split among the federations to their clubs using the following formula:

50% of the allocation to a national federation will be divided among the participating Champions League clubs from that nation based on fixed percentages determined by UEFA.

The other 50% is paid out in proportion to the number of matches played by each club in 2023/24.
The Champions League trophy on display.

As alluded to, last season’s winners Manchester City were awarded an additional £68.4m (€80m/$86.4m) for their Champions League exploits. Dortmund nor Madrid will rake in the absolute most available this term, given neither have boasted flawless records thus far. The former lost once and drew two games in their group stage – and they even lost 2-1 to Atletico Madrid at the quarter-final stage.

The Spanish side, however, have yielded the most amount of money thus far, having not lost a game. Having escaped the group stages with six wins, plus zero draws and losses, to their name, they have suffered a total of four draws from their six knockout outings. To learn how the Champions League prize money will be distributed for the 2024/25 season, please read below.

 

Author

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

European Leagues

Revealed! 100 Most Valued Transfer Clubs In World; Manchester United Missing In Top 10

Published

on

Palmer’s late double gives Chelsea win in 7-goal thriller against Man United

European Champions Real Madrid, armed with a glittering roster of high-value talent headlined by Kylian Mbappe, Vinicius Junior and Jude Bellingham, have been crowned as the most valuable squad in world football in the latest CIES Football Observatory data report.

Of the top 100 teams compiled by the stats specialists, Carlo Ancelotti’s side leads the way with the highest aggregate transfer value ever recorded for a football club: €1.728 billion. The team also topped a value ranking released by Football Benchmark last week.

Premier League holders Manchester City rank second with an ‘owned-players’ valuation of €1.471 billion, dwarfed by Real Madrid’s tally which is almost €300 million higher.

Chelsea place third with a value of €1.38 billion spread across 54 players- the most on the list. Despite recent results that have not always lived up to expectations, the Londoners have a squad that is both rich in numbers and young talented players tied by long-term contracts, which inflate valuations according to the CIES model.

Arsenal and FC Barcelona trail in fourth and fifth, with the latter being particularly impressive due to its low spending in recent windows and heavy reliance on academy talent.

Notably all of the Premier League ‘Big Six’ have a place inside the top ten, with Liverpool (6th, €1.09 billion), Manchester United (8th, €989 million) and Spurs (9th, €886 million) fending off the likes of Bayern Munich, Inter Milan and Juventus.

It is Bayer Leverkusen who secures another valuable win over their German rivals to land the final spot in the top ten, with a valuation of €862 million.

The data shows that in terms of the average value of players owned, Real Madrid are in first place, followed by three English clubs (Manchester City, Arsenal and Liverpool).

Despite their high placement, Manchester United missed out on the €1 billion valuation despite spending far north of that figure on the current squad, suggesting players’ values have depreciated since joining, or the club overpaid in the first place.

Each and every Premier League club features in the top 100 list, including newcomers Ipswich at the foot of the table with a valuation of €129 million. This still ranks it higher than Saudi League champions Al Hilal and Cristiano Ronaldo’s Al Nassr, who tally €125 million and €124 million. Each of those clubs have spent considerably more than that figure to put together their current squads.

CIES estimates were calculated on the basis of a statistical model developed exclusively by the CIES Football Observatory, using a methodology explained in a recently published in the International Journal of Financial Studies.

Source: InsideWorldFootball

Author

Continue Reading

Premier League

Ten Haag Must Go! Man Utd Schedule Talks With Two Top Managers

Published

on

Man United  Set To Make Another Drastic Boardroom Decision

Manchester United co-owner Sir Jim Ratcliffe has made it clear to his colleagues that he wants to see Erik ten Hag relieved of his managerial duties, according to TEAMtalk.

The Red Devils have had a dismal start to the season and currently sit 14th in the Premier League table and huge pressure is mounting on the Dutchman.

Many stories regarding Ten Hag’s future are doing the rounds and with the club’s executive committee meeting in London on Tuesday, TEAMtalk can give an exclusive insight into the thought process of the Manchester United hierarchy.

And we understand that Ratcliffe has made it clear that he wants change to happen and sources say that potential replacements for Ten Hag are already being assessed.

The British billionaire was ready to replace Ten Hag before the start of the season but ultimately handed him a one-year contract extension after they were unable to agree a deal with a suitable replacement.

Just like in the summer, Ratcliffe is willing to wait to find the right man to replace Ten Hag and has handed control of the situation over to Dan Ashworth, Jason Wilcox and Omar Berrada. They are looking at all options with two names coming up as the favourites so far.

Thomas Tuchel and Graham Potter are the two candidates being closely looked at by Man Utd and talks with the duo are expected in the near future.

Tuchel spoke with Man Utd over the summer but didn’t feel the timing was right for him to take the job. However, the former Bayern Munich and Chelsea boss is open to another conversation and feels ready to return to management.

Newcastle boss Eddie Howe has also been discussed behind the scenes at Man Utd. However, the cost and difficult;y of getting him out of his contract at St James’ Park is seen as a stumbling block.

Author

Continue Reading

Premier League

Tension in Ten Haag Camp as Seven-Hour Meeting With Man Utd Owners End With No Update

Published

on

Man Utd confirm double injury blow ahead Chelsea clash

No indication over Ten Hag decision after seven-hour Man Utd meeting

Latest from Sky Sports News’ chief reporter Kaveh Solhekol:

As far as Erik ten Hag is concerned, no news is good news.

“Manchester United’s perspective on what happened today is that this was a routine meeting. The meeting was held at the headquarters of INEOS, who are now in charge of all football operations.

“Of course, there’s been a lot of media focus on the meeting today around Ten Hag’s future. 

“But all the information I’m getting from this meeting is that it was a routine meeting. Lots of things were discussed apart from Ten Hag, like the redevelopment of Old Trafford, commercial and sponsorship deals and accounts.

“The meeting went on for quite a long time. It started around 9.30am as Sir Jim Ratcliffe arrived with Sir Dave Brailsford. Also in attendance was Dan Ashworth, Omar Berrada, Jean-Claude Blanc. Joel Glazer and Jason Wilcox were also expected to attend.

“We didn’t see anyone leaving until around 4.45pm, when Blanc left by the front door.

“I think a decision was made that Sir Jim Ratcliffe should leave by the back exit because there were so many people here.

“The meeting went on for almost seven hours. I think if you want to be a conspiracy theorist, you may say, ‘Why did the meeting go on for so long?’

“But the sense I get is, at the moment, no news is good news for Ten Hag. 

“Of course, if a decision has been made that Ten Hag should be replaced, the media are not going to be the first people who are going to be told – that would be done in the right way. 

“I am getting no indication that that kind of decision was made today, and for the time being, I’m being told that it’s business as usual.”

Author

Continue Reading

Trending